Senate passes bill creating new hurdles for wind, solar development

Photo of Bowling Green solar field at Carter and Newton roads, taken by Brian Bushong

By Jake Zuckerman

Ohio Capital Journal

The Ohio Senate passed legislation Wednesday granting new powers to county commissions to scuttle wind and solar development projects.

Senate Bill 52 would require the green energy developers — before filing a separate application with the state Power Siting Board that currently exists in law — to hold a public hearing with advance notice to local officials.

County commissions could then pass resolutions to ban wind or solar projects outright or limit them to certain “energy development districts” in the county.

The bill passed on a 20-13 vote, with five Republicans joining all eight members of the Democratic caucus in opposition. State Sen. Theresa Gavarone, R-Bowling Green, voted in favor of the bill.

A fellowship of unlikely allies opposed the bill, including the green energy industry and its advocates, utility companies like American Electric Power, oil drillers like BP, the Chamber of Commerce, the Ohio Farm Bureau, and the Ohio Manufacturing Association.

The bill’s critics argued the Ohio Power Siting Board already imposes a rigorous application process that spans pricey submissions, environmental reviews, public hearings, staff investigations and a decision from seven voting board members (comprised mostly of the governor’s cabinet heads).

Source: Ohio Power Siting Board.

SB 52, they said, is simply another layer of bureaucracy that doesn’t apply to coal or natural gas. This is likely to chill interest in potential development.

The bill’s lead sponsor, Sen. Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, said fossil fuels like natural gas and coal are more necessary for the reliability of the grid than wind and solar. He said the legislation is about giving the localities a voice.

He said criticisms regarding parity between renewables and fossil fuel energy sources is an apples-and-oranges comparison.

“I think when you’re looking at, for example, a natural gas plant: a natural gas plant is going to be confined within one area, a natural gas plant is not going to affect nearly as many acres in most places as these solar and wind projects are. They’re not as transformative, and they’re not being put primarily in residential areas in rural parts of the state,” he said.

Renewable energy advocates said the bill would scare off interest from developers on building green energy in Ohio.

Randi Leppla, vice president of energy policy for the Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund, said the bill adds a layer of red tape unique to renewable energy that runs through a local political body that lacks the expertise of the OPSB.

“We’re all using energy and electricity, and it’s really urgent in the fight against climate change that we transition as quickly as possible toward clean energy sources,” she said. “This bill has the potential to block our ability to do that.”

Neil Waggoner, a senior campaign representative with the Sierra Club, said SB 52 is a bad bill by itself for creating new regulatory hurdles that only apply to wind and solar and are likely to whittle down interest from potential developers.

However, he said the bigger picture includes a legislature moving on several pieces of legislation that favor fossil fuels. He cited one bill, passed by the House and under Senate review, to prevent local governments from banning or limiting natural gas development; or another that allows gas drillers to sell their fracking waste for de-icing or portable restroom use.

That’s not to mention the ongoing, Ohio ratepayer-funded bailout of two coal plants in Ohio and Indiana to the tune of an estimated $700 million over ten years.

“This bill today is bad, but it’s part of this overall agenda taking place that supports, helps, bails out gas, coal, fossil fuels, and makes it harder for renewable energy to compete and be developed,” he said.

Senate President Matt Huffman, R-Lima, defended the bill in a press conference with reporters after the vote. He said localities typically wield many different forms of control over new buildings and development within their borders.

While he acknowledged SB 52 creates unique regulations for renewables as opposed to non-renewables, he said wind and solar power is not a significant enough piece of Ohio’s energy mix to warrant superseding local control.

“These [renewable generators] produce relatively low energy, and the energy that they do produce is expensive,” he said. “So I don’t think they’re deserving of those exemptions.”

Besides allowing a county commission to strike down proposals, the bill also gives two new votes representing local government on the Power Siting Board for that specific project’s approval vote.

Along with the Democrats, the following Republicans voted against passage: Niraj Antani, Matt Dolan, Frank Hoagland, Stephanie Kunze and Bob Peterson.

The bill now goes to the House of Representatives for review.

***

Also from Ohio Capital Journal:

House Republicans pitch $1,000 bonus for cops, EMS, firefighters

Ohio House Republicans announced Wednesday a proposal pay $1,000 bonuses to police, firefighters, and EMS workers.

Relief dollars from the American Rescue Plan, President Joe Biden’s signature COVID-19 economic relief package, would pay for the checks. The plan at large would cost about $83 million, the sponsors said.

Rep. Craig Riedel, R-Defiance, said at a press conference the idea came from Florida, where Gov. Ron DeSantis recently enacted a similar idea.

“This last year and a half have been some really difficult times for our country, and in particular, first responders and law enforcement, they have been put in some very, very difficult situations,” he said. “What we’re doing here in Ohio is saying, we have your back.”

While the proposal is tailored toward “first responders,” the sponsors said the bonuses would not apply to doctors or nurses who provided direct care during the pandemic. READ MORE

“Born alive” abortion bill introduced again, despite current law, low statistics

Two medical professionals in the Ohio Senate reintroduced a bill that would criminalize physician inaction in “botched abortions,” but say the bill is more about having a reporting system, something that already exists in state law.

The bill is sponsored by state Sen. Terry Johnson, R-McDermott, who currently works as a drug addiction treatment physician, and former ER doctor Sen. Steve Huffman, R-Tipp City.

Johnson said while the bill has punitive aspects for physicians, it is primarily a measure to “provide a reporting system” for abortion procedures in which the baby is born alive after a “failed abortion,” which research shows could only happen closer to the full term of a pregnancy. Full term is considered 40 weeks gestation.

In Ohio, abortion is legal up to 22 weeks gestation. READ MORE

States follow Ohio’s lead in announcing their own vaccine lotteries

What some Ohio lawmakers saw as a wasteful gameshow gimmick, other governors saw as an opportunity. 

It took only a few weeks after Gov. Mike DeWine announced the Vax-A-Million for other states to introduce their own vaccine lottery programs. There are cash prizes in Oregon, music festival tickets awarded in Delaware and even custom rifles available for the winners in West Virginia.

“I can’t stand for Ohio to get ahead of us on anything,” the Charleston Gazette-Mail quoted Gov. Jim Justice as saying. 

There are nearly a dozen states across the country offering some type of vaccine lottery. In total, these states are offering close to $50 million in prize money along with college scholarships and other prizes.

The details differ from state to state. Some require registration, while others enroll vaccinated citizens automatically; some allow winners to remain anonymous, while others (like Ohio) want to use the winners’ likenesses for marketing purposes.

All the states, however, share an identical goal: Improving the vaccination rate by incentivizing people to get their appointments scheduled.  READ MORE