BG Independent News

brought to you by

brought to you by
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • News Break
  • Ohio Capital Journal
  • Community Happenings
  • Community Voices
    • Community Opinion
  • Arts and Entertainment
  • Education
    • Campus
  • Obituaries
  • Video
    • Story Videos
    • Concert Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Advertise
  • Support
  • Merch
Hot Topics
  • October 2, 2026 | BG Manor celebrates 50 years of caring for Bowling Green community
  • October 1, 2026 | People of all heritages invited to celebrate Latino community during these uncertain times
  • October 1, 2026 | Wood County Fair Board requests Aug. 1-8 for 2027 fair, looks to move future fairs away from state fair dates
  • September 30, 2026 | One confirmed case of ‘highly contagious’ measles puts public health and local residents on alert
  • September 30, 2026 | What’s happening in our community (updated Oct. 2)
Home data centers

Public comment rules adopted to keep data center discussions more controlled

TOPICS:Meta data centerWood County Planning Commission
Smaller crowd attended Tuesday's Wood County Planning Commission meeting.

Posted By: Jan Larson McLaughlin March 3, 2026

By JAN McLAUGHLIN

BG Independent News

Chris Coultrip has reluctantly come to the conclusion that people are going to have to coexist with data centers. But neighbors should at least know what to expect and how to protect themselves as much as possible.

Coultrip, of Perrysburg Township, was one of six people to speak at the Wood County Planning Commission meeting Tuesday evening. Though data centers were not on the agenda, the planning commission allowed citizens to speak during the public comment portion of the meeting.

“We have to learn to live with these data centers,” Coultrip said. But citizens also need to push for oversight of the massive sites like the Meta center under construction in Middleton Township. 

“In my opinion, they belong in industrial areas. They don’t belong in residential areas,” she said.

Unlike the county planning commission meeting in January, which turned into an angry shouting match at times with nearly 150 citizens present, Tuesday’s meeting was much more controlled. 

Too controlled, for some of the citizens.

Prior to the public comment portion of the meeting, the commission adopted rules for public conduct. “Please understand we want to hear what you have to say,” said John Musteric, president of the planning commission.

Those rules required people to give their name and address, limited them to three minutes each, and noted that those offering repetitive comments will be asked to move along. The rules are similar to those used by many governmental entities.

Musteric made it clear that commission members would not be engaging in discussion, but may clarify or correct information at the end of the meeting. He warned against poor behavior – something which Musteric himself was accused of at the last meeting.

“There will be no outbursts or other disrespectful action,” Musteric said.

During the January meeting, members of the planning commission spent much of the time explaining that they do not have the authority to make zoning changes like those needed for data centers. The commission makes recommendations to townships, with the trustees having the final say on zoning requests.

Chris Coultrip expresses her concerns about data centers.

From the small audience on Tuesday, just six signed up to speak. Coultrip was followed by Mark Patton, who lives near the Meta data center, and who posted again on social media that the planning commission meeting would focus on data centers. However, the only agenda item was actually a zoning issue in Troy Township.

Patton reminded the planning commission that it was stated at the January meeting that counties in Ohio could not issue moratoriums on data centers – yet Fulton County did just that the evening before, he said.

“Was that a lie,” or just a lack of knowledge on the part of Wood County officials, he asked the planning commission.

However, a search of news coverage of data center moratoriums appears to show that the Fulton County that adopted the moratorium is in Indiana – not Ohio.

Mark Patton voices objections to data centers.

Next to speak was Joe DeMare, of Bowling Green, who suggested county officials could slow the spread of data centers by committing to no tax breaks for such developments, and agree to end “secret agreements” or non-disclosure agreements.

DeMare expressed concerns about preserving resources like water, and protecting the rural nature of the county.

Three minutes into his comments, an alarm went off and DeMare was asked to stop speaking. “You didn’t warn us there would be an alarm,” he objected.

DeMare may have had time for his comments, but he spent the first portion of his three minutes scolding the planning commission for putting their comfort over the citizens’ right to speak for longer durations.

Cindi Lane, of Perrysburg Township, spoke next about the “catastrophe” created by data centers – the potential loss of peace and quiet, dark night skies, clean water and air. She spoke of spiking utility bills and drains on water sources.

Richard Reichow, who lives north of Bowling Green, began his comments by asking Musteric to apologize to citizens in the room for being so disrespectful to them during the January meeting.

Reichow mentioned the 350 MW generator “rubber stamped overnight” by the Ohio Power Siting Board, and the possible risks that could create. “We still have some time to stop that,” he said.

As he was wrapping up, the three-minute alarm went off and he was not allowed to finish. 

“This is not appropriate,” he said as he walked to his seat.

The last citizen to speak was Tracy Wyatt, who cautioned the commission about their strict rules and unwillingness to listen.

“You’re never going to win people over by silencing them,” she said.

Wyatt also spoke about the Fulton County moratorium, thinking it was in Ohio not Indiana.

“You are capable, you are just unwilling,” she said.

As the meeting ended abruptly at the end of public comments, residents expressed their dissatisfaction – hoping for some answers from the planning commission.

“This is not back and forth,” Musteric said of the public comment period. He suggested citizens email comments and questions to the planning commission, and they may get a response.

More about Jan Larson McLaughlin
Posted by: Jan Larson McLaughlin on March 3, 2026.
SHARE TWEET PIN SHARE
  • Previous post
  • Next post

Related Articles

data centers, planning commission, Zoning

Rezoning request filed for 32 acres surrounding the Meta data center site


Community Opinion, data centers

Bowling Green resident asks why elected officials ‘cater to Meta’


data centers, tax abatements, utilities

Data center concerns – high demands on water, electric, gas; low commitment when tax breaks expire


Community Voices, Housing

Wood County offers free assistance to reduce, remove lead hazards in homes


News Break

  • State approves Wood County property values
  • BG Post Office temporarily closed after motorist drives through front doors into lobby
  • Fraudsters claiming to raise money for BG Parks & Rec
  • BG Council Committee of the Whole to select the final district map
  • Auditor’s website levy estimator informs voters of tax impact

Let’s Feed the Need

Let’s Feed the Need
  • Ohio lawmakers approve 90-day gas tax holiday just weeks ahead of election
  • Gas tax holiday proposal gets first hearing in Ohio Senate
  • Ohio farmers need help after tariffs, foreign competition bring big struggles

Support us

Access to BG Independent News is free, but reporting, writing and managing all take time, money, and hard work. We depend on our readers to sustain our efforts and appreciate your support. Click the image below for information on how you can support BG Independent News.

Arts & Entertainment Sponsor

WCDPL Connect (Click to read)

WCDPL Connect (Click to read)

WCDPL Bookish (click for information)

WCDPL Bookish (click for information)

Community Voices

Community Voices is our section for Bowling Green area points of view. It will also be used for information about local programs, city and business developments, BGSU items, and other submitted stories deemed to be of interest to our readers. Opinions represented here do not necessarily reflect those of BG Independent News and no endorsement is implied.
Bobcat statue

October 2, 2026

BG sports scores


October 2, 2026

Eastwood FFA officers plan for busy year


October 1, 2026

Sale of specialty plates honoring Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library surge


October 1, 2026

BGSU Fine Arts Center Galleries present ‘Impressions of the Floating World’ exhibition


October 1, 2026

BG Human Relations Commission grant applications now open


Community Opinion

Community Opinion

Click typewriter to read opinions from readers or to learn how to submit one of your own.

advertise

Interested in advertising here on the sidebar of BG Independent News, or in becoming an annual sponsor? Contact elizabeth roberts-zibbel at elizabeth@bgindependentmedia.org or click image below for the Advertise page, also accessible from the Main Menu heading above.

Follow on Facebook
Authors
  • Jan Larson McLaughlin

    published 11614 articles

  • David Dupont

    published 9180 articles

All Content Copyright BG Independent News ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Any use of materials on this website, including reproduction, modification, distribution or republication, without the prior written consent of BGIN, is strictly prohibited.